read more<\/p>\n
![\"Prediction](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DSC09122-X4.jpg.webp\")
\n <\/a>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n Prediction for Astralis vs Ninjas in Pyjamas \u2014 StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 Stage 2 <\/a>\n <\/h3>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/article> <\/div>\n<\/div>\nHead-to-head \u2014 many close duels in the past<\/strong><\/h2>\n3DMAX and fnatic have played several matches against each other during 2024\u20132025, often in very tight battles. However, 3DMAX are currently in a downturn, while fnatic have gained strong momentum.<\/p>\n
Current world rankings:<\/p>\n
\n- 3DMAX \u2014 below fnatic in the global standings<\/li>\n
- fnatic \u2014 inside the world top-30<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
The advantage according to statistics lies with fnatic, increasing their chances in the opening Swiss round.<\/p>\n
Current form<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- 3DMAX \u2014 decline at the worst moment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
3DMAX enter Stage 2 with performance far too unstable for this level. Losses to G2, Astralis, FlyQuest and B8 highlight structural issues and a high error rate. The team holds a 53 percent win rate over the last three months, but the most recent results suggest regression rather than progress.<\/p>\n
At this stage, 3DMAX do not show the confidence needed to defeat a team like fnatic in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DSC09016-X4.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic \u2014 stability through discipline and control<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
fnatic arrive in Stage 2 after a strong showing in Stage 1: victories over NRG and Imperial, close competition with FaZe, and consistent execution of the game plan. The team has nearly a 68 percent win rate over the last three months and objectively looks more convincing.<\/p>\n
Their structure, tempo, and execution in mid-rounds are exactly what is needed in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
Map Pool & Veto<\/strong><\/h2>\nStatistics over the last 3 months (3DMAX | fnatic):<\/p>\n
\n- Dust2: 44% | 46%<\/li>\n
- Mirage: \u2014 | 65%<\/li>\n
- Inferno: 71% | 60%<\/li>\n
- Nuke: 73% | 0%<\/li>\n
- Train: 27% | 67%<\/li>\n
- Overpass: 40% | 44%<\/li>\n
- Ancient: 33% | 79%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Expected veto:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic remove Nuke \u2014 one of the strongest cards for 3DMAX<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX remove Mirage \u2014 where fnatic showcase their strengths consistently<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Likely picks:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic: Ancient \u2014 their most reliable map<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX: Inferno \u2014 the map where they feel the most consistent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Decider: Dust2 \u2014 similar win rate, but fnatic appear stronger in duels<\/p>\n
Key duels<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- Ex3rcice vs blameF \u2014 leaders who dictate the pace<\/li>\n
- Maka vs KRIMZ \u2014 consistency against experience<\/li>\n
- bodyy vs feaR \u2014 who shifts the balance in decisive rounds?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n
read more<\/p>\n
\n \n <\/div>\n
Head-to-head \u2014 many close duels in the past<\/strong><\/h2>\n3DMAX and fnatic have played several matches against each other during 2024\u20132025, often in very tight battles. However, 3DMAX are currently in a downturn, while fnatic have gained strong momentum.<\/p>\n
Current world rankings:<\/p>\n
\n- 3DMAX \u2014 below fnatic in the global standings<\/li>\n
- fnatic \u2014 inside the world top-30<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
The advantage according to statistics lies with fnatic, increasing their chances in the opening Swiss round.<\/p>\n
Current form<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- 3DMAX \u2014 decline at the worst moment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
3DMAX enter Stage 2 with performance far too unstable for this level. Losses to G2, Astralis, FlyQuest and B8 highlight structural issues and a high error rate. The team holds a 53 percent win rate over the last three months, but the most recent results suggest regression rather than progress.<\/p>\n
At this stage, 3DMAX do not show the confidence needed to defeat a team like fnatic in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic \u2014 stability through discipline and control<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
fnatic arrive in Stage 2 after a strong showing in Stage 1: victories over NRG and Imperial, close competition with FaZe, and consistent execution of the game plan. The team has nearly a 68 percent win rate over the last three months and objectively looks more convincing.<\/p>\n
Their structure, tempo, and execution in mid-rounds are exactly what is needed in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
Map Pool & Veto<\/strong><\/h2>\nStatistics over the last 3 months (3DMAX | fnatic):<\/p>\n
\n- Dust2: 44% | 46%<\/li>\n
- Mirage: \u2014 | 65%<\/li>\n
- Inferno: 71% | 60%<\/li>\n
- Nuke: 73% | 0%<\/li>\n
- Train: 27% | 67%<\/li>\n
- Overpass: 40% | 44%<\/li>\n
- Ancient: 33% | 79%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Expected veto:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic remove Nuke \u2014 one of the strongest cards for 3DMAX<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX remove Mirage \u2014 where fnatic showcase their strengths consistently<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Likely picks:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic: Ancient \u2014 their most reliable map<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX: Inferno \u2014 the map where they feel the most consistent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Decider: Dust2 \u2014 similar win rate, but fnatic appear stronger in duels<\/p>\n
Key duels<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- Ex3rcice vs blameF \u2014 leaders who dictate the pace<\/li>\n
- Maka vs KRIMZ \u2014 consistency against experience<\/li>\n
- bodyy vs feaR \u2014 who shifts the balance in decisive rounds?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n
read more<\/p>\n
\n \n <\/div>\n
The advantage according to statistics lies with fnatic, increasing their chances in the opening Swiss round.<\/p>\n
Current form<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- 3DMAX \u2014 decline at the worst moment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
3DMAX enter Stage 2 with performance far too unstable for this level. Losses to G2, Astralis, FlyQuest and B8 highlight structural issues and a high error rate. The team holds a 53 percent win rate over the last three months, but the most recent results suggest regression rather than progress.<\/p>\n
At this stage, 3DMAX do not show the confidence needed to defeat a team like fnatic in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic \u2014 stability through discipline and control<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
fnatic arrive in Stage 2 after a strong showing in Stage 1: victories over NRG and Imperial, close competition with FaZe, and consistent execution of the game plan. The team has nearly a 68 percent win rate over the last three months and objectively looks more convincing.<\/p>\n
Their structure, tempo, and execution in mid-rounds are exactly what is needed in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
Map Pool & Veto<\/strong><\/h2>\nStatistics over the last 3 months (3DMAX | fnatic):<\/p>\n
\n- Dust2: 44% | 46%<\/li>\n
- Mirage: \u2014 | 65%<\/li>\n
- Inferno: 71% | 60%<\/li>\n
- Nuke: 73% | 0%<\/li>\n
- Train: 27% | 67%<\/li>\n
- Overpass: 40% | 44%<\/li>\n
- Ancient: 33% | 79%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Expected veto:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic remove Nuke \u2014 one of the strongest cards for 3DMAX<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX remove Mirage \u2014 where fnatic showcase their strengths consistently<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Likely picks:<\/p>\n
\n- fnatic: Ancient \u2014 their most reliable map<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX: Inferno \u2014 the map where they feel the most consistent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Decider: Dust2 \u2014 similar win rate, but fnatic appear stronger in duels<\/p>\n
Key duels<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- Ex3rcice vs blameF \u2014 leaders who dictate the pace<\/li>\n
- Maka vs KRIMZ \u2014 consistency against experience<\/li>\n
- bodyy vs feaR \u2014 who shifts the balance in decisive rounds?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n
read more<\/p>\n
\n \n <\/div>\n
3DMAX enter Stage 2 with performance far too unstable for this level. Losses to G2, Astralis, FlyQuest and B8 highlight structural issues and a high error rate. The team holds a 53 percent win rate over the last three months, but the most recent results suggest regression rather than progress.<\/p>\n
At this stage, 3DMAX do not show the confidence needed to defeat a team like fnatic in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
- \n
- fnatic \u2014 stability through discipline and control<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
fnatic arrive in Stage 2 after a strong showing in Stage 1: victories over NRG and Imperial, close competition with FaZe, and consistent execution of the game plan. The team has nearly a 68 percent win rate over the last three months and objectively looks more convincing.<\/p>\n
Their structure, tempo, and execution in mid-rounds are exactly what is needed in a Bo1.<\/p>\n
Map Pool & Veto<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Statistics over the last 3 months (3DMAX | fnatic):<\/p>\n
- \n
- Dust2: 44% | 46%<\/li>\n
- Mirage: \u2014 | 65%<\/li>\n
- Inferno: 71% | 60%<\/li>\n
- Nuke: 73% | 0%<\/li>\n
- Train: 27% | 67%<\/li>\n
- Overpass: 40% | 44%<\/li>\n
- Ancient: 33% | 79%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Expected veto:<\/p>\n
- \n
- fnatic remove Nuke \u2014 one of the strongest cards for 3DMAX<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX remove Mirage \u2014 where fnatic showcase their strengths consistently<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Likely picks:<\/p>\n
- \n
- fnatic: Ancient \u2014 their most reliable map<\/li>\n
- 3DMAX: Inferno \u2014 the map where they feel the most consistent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Decider: Dust2 \u2014 similar win rate, but fnatic appear stronger in duels<\/p>\n
Key duels<\/strong><\/h2>\n
- \n
- Ex3rcice vs blameF \u2014 leaders who dictate the pace<\/li>\n
- Maka vs KRIMZ \u2014 consistency against experience<\/li>\n
- bodyy vs feaR \u2014 who shifts the balance in decisive rounds?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n
read more<\/p>\n
\n\n <\/div>\n
![\"Top](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/54947626175_368b3c9d47_h-e1764332789947.webp\")
\n <\/a>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n \n