read more<\/p>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/55243193311_ce56248545_k-1.jpg.webp\")
\n <\/a>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n The interview after which Jcobbb changed: fans joke about his new image <\/a>\n <\/h3>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/article> <\/div>\n<\/div>\nWhy Liquid still chose BLAST<\/strong><\/h2>\nflashie explained that the team understood the possible overlap even before the start. But participating in BLAST was strategically more important for Liquid, because it was their only chance to fight for invitations before the August 3 deadline.<\/p>\n
According to him:<\/p>\n
We knew there could be a conflict between the two tournaments, but participating in BLAST was our only chance to try to secure invites on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This clearly shows Liquid\u2019s logic: the team accepted the short-term risk with the Swedish LAN for the sake of a potentially more important result in the invitation system.<\/p>\n
In other words, Liquid did not simply end up in an inconvenient schedule by accident. They consciously made a bet on BLAST, because this tournament could carry more weight for them in the nearest ranking cutoff.<\/p>\n
What happens if Liquid win the quarterfinal<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe most interesting part of flashie\u2019s explanation concerns the scenario in which Liquid successfully start at BLAST. He noted that the team will likely play against the first or second seed in Malta, so their match should take place on July 30.<\/p>\n
If we win our quarterfinal, we will withdraw from the Stake tournament. This will lead to the loss of some points, but it will only affect our September ranking, because the tournament ends after the invites are already sent out on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This is the key point. Liquid are effectively ready to sacrifice some future ranking points if BLAST gives them a better position now. In addition, flashie added that no major invite distributions are expected in September, while a quarterfinal victory at BLAST will itself bring the team points.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/20260602_Viola-Schuldner_IEM-Cologne_01417.jpg\")
Photo Copyright by ESL<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat happens if Liquid lose<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe second scenario is simpler. If Liquid cannot advance further at BLAST, the team plans to immediately switch to the Swedish LAN. flashie explained it directly:<\/p>\n
If we are not successful in the quarterfinal, the next day we will fly to Stockholm to be ready for our game on August 1.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
In that case, Liquid will keep the chance to play against atputies and avoid the worst-case scenario of withdrawing. But to do that, the team will need to quickly reset after the loss, fly to Sweden, and already play a new match the next day.<\/p>\n
Why this matters for the ranking<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis story is interesting not only because of the schedule clash itself. It clearly shows how important working with rankings, invite deadlines, and tournament selection has become for teams. Liquid now have to calculate not only prize money or event status, but also exactly when a tournament ends and which ranking its results will count toward.<\/p>\n
That is why the decision looks pragmatic. BLAST can give the team a more important result before the invite distribution date, while potential losses from the Swedish LAN may take effect later. For Liquid, this is not an ideal scenario, but in their situation, it may be the least painful one.<\/p>\n\n
Why Liquid still chose BLAST<\/strong><\/h2>\nflashie explained that the team understood the possible overlap even before the start. But participating in BLAST was strategically more important for Liquid, because it was their only chance to fight for invitations before the August 3 deadline.<\/p>\n
According to him:<\/p>\n
We knew there could be a conflict between the two tournaments, but participating in BLAST was our only chance to try to secure invites on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This clearly shows Liquid\u2019s logic: the team accepted the short-term risk with the Swedish LAN for the sake of a potentially more important result in the invitation system.<\/p>\n
In other words, Liquid did not simply end up in an inconvenient schedule by accident. They consciously made a bet on BLAST, because this tournament could carry more weight for them in the nearest ranking cutoff.<\/p>\n
What happens if Liquid win the quarterfinal<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe most interesting part of flashie\u2019s explanation concerns the scenario in which Liquid successfully start at BLAST. He noted that the team will likely play against the first or second seed in Malta, so their match should take place on July 30.<\/p>\n
If we win our quarterfinal, we will withdraw from the Stake tournament. This will lead to the loss of some points, but it will only affect our September ranking, because the tournament ends after the invites are already sent out on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This is the key point. Liquid are effectively ready to sacrifice some future ranking points if BLAST gives them a better position now. In addition, flashie added that no major invite distributions are expected in September, while a quarterfinal victory at BLAST will itself bring the team points.<\/p>\nPhoto Copyright by ESL<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat happens if Liquid lose<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe second scenario is simpler. If Liquid cannot advance further at BLAST, the team plans to immediately switch to the Swedish LAN. flashie explained it directly:<\/p>\n
If we are not successful in the quarterfinal, the next day we will fly to Stockholm to be ready for our game on August 1.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
In that case, Liquid will keep the chance to play against atputies and avoid the worst-case scenario of withdrawing. But to do that, the team will need to quickly reset after the loss, fly to Sweden, and already play a new match the next day.<\/p>\n
Why this matters for the ranking<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis story is interesting not only because of the schedule clash itself. It clearly shows how important working with rankings, invite deadlines, and tournament selection has become for teams. Liquid now have to calculate not only prize money or event status, but also exactly when a tournament ends and which ranking its results will count toward.<\/p>\n
That is why the decision looks pragmatic. BLAST can give the team a more important result before the invite distribution date, while potential losses from the Swedish LAN may take effect later. For Liquid, this is not an ideal scenario, but in their situation, it may be the least painful one.<\/p>\n\n
We knew there could be a conflict between the two tournaments, but participating in BLAST was our only chance to try to secure invites on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This clearly shows Liquid\u2019s logic: the team accepted the short-term risk with the Swedish LAN for the sake of a potentially more important result in the invitation system.<\/p>\n
In other words, Liquid did not simply end up in an inconvenient schedule by accident. They consciously made a bet on BLAST, because this tournament could carry more weight for them in the nearest ranking cutoff.<\/p>\n
What happens if Liquid win the quarterfinal<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe most interesting part of flashie\u2019s explanation concerns the scenario in which Liquid successfully start at BLAST. He noted that the team will likely play against the first or second seed in Malta, so their match should take place on July 30.<\/p>\n
If we win our quarterfinal, we will withdraw from the Stake tournament. This will lead to the loss of some points, but it will only affect our September ranking, because the tournament ends after the invites are already sent out on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This is the key point. Liquid are effectively ready to sacrifice some future ranking points if BLAST gives them a better position now. In addition, flashie added that no major invite distributions are expected in September, while a quarterfinal victory at BLAST will itself bring the team points.<\/p>\nPhoto Copyright by ESL<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat happens if Liquid lose<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe second scenario is simpler. If Liquid cannot advance further at BLAST, the team plans to immediately switch to the Swedish LAN. flashie explained it directly:<\/p>\n
If we are not successful in the quarterfinal, the next day we will fly to Stockholm to be ready for our game on August 1.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
In that case, Liquid will keep the chance to play against atputies and avoid the worst-case scenario of withdrawing. But to do that, the team will need to quickly reset after the loss, fly to Sweden, and already play a new match the next day.<\/p>\n
Why this matters for the ranking<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis story is interesting not only because of the schedule clash itself. It clearly shows how important working with rankings, invite deadlines, and tournament selection has become for teams. Liquid now have to calculate not only prize money or event status, but also exactly when a tournament ends and which ranking its results will count toward.<\/p>\n
That is why the decision looks pragmatic. BLAST can give the team a more important result before the invite distribution date, while potential losses from the Swedish LAN may take effect later. For Liquid, this is not an ideal scenario, but in their situation, it may be the least painful one.<\/p>\n\n
If we win our quarterfinal, we will withdraw from the Stake tournament. This will lead to the loss of some points, but it will only affect our September ranking, because the tournament ends after the invites are already sent out on August 3.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n
This is the key point. Liquid are effectively ready to sacrifice some future ranking points if BLAST gives them a better position now. In addition, flashie added that no major invite distributions are expected in September, while a quarterfinal victory at BLAST will itself bring the team points.<\/p>\n The second scenario is simpler. If Liquid cannot advance further at BLAST, the team plans to immediately switch to the Swedish LAN. flashie explained it directly:<\/p>\n If we are not successful in the quarterfinal, the next day we will fly to Stockholm to be ready for our game on August 1.<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n In that case, Liquid will keep the chance to play against atputies and avoid the worst-case scenario of withdrawing. But to do that, the team will need to quickly reset after the loss, fly to Sweden, and already play a new match the next day.<\/p>\n This story is interesting not only because of the schedule clash itself. It clearly shows how important working with rankings, invite deadlines, and tournament selection has become for teams. Liquid now have to calculate not only prize money or event status, but also exactly when a tournament ends and which ranking its results will count toward.<\/p>\n That is why the decision looks pragmatic. BLAST can give the team a more important result before the invite distribution date, while potential losses from the Swedish LAN may take effect later. For Liquid, this is not an ideal scenario, but in their situation, it may be the least painful one.<\/p>\n\nWhat happens if Liquid lose<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Why this matters for the ranking<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"CND:](\"https:\/\/community.skin.club\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Main-x-Name-7.jpg.webp\")
\n <\/a>\n <\/figure>\n <\/div>\n \n