BIG EQUIPA’s first official CS2 match was meant to mark progress for women on the professional stage. The team debuted in the CCT circuit in their first full-scale tournament with public broadcasts. Instead, attention quickly shifted away from the game. During a third-party co-stream, a commentator made offensive remarks about the players. The clip spread rapidly on social media and sparked immediate backlash.
What happened on the broadcast
🫂 @BIG_EQUIPA faced hate right after their very first official match, coming from a random commentator in tier-2 tournaments.@sosyaoai: “We were playing CCT, the team’s debut. I was thinking about clipping my 1v3, and then I get this sent to me. Is this really acceptable? =)”… pic.twitter.com/WVjG1Pk693
— FEMALEGG (@femalegg) February 10, 2026
The incident did not happen on the official tournament stream. It occurred on an independent channel with co-streaming rights. During BIG EQUIPA’s match, the commentator made remarks that much of the community described as sexist and dismissive. Viewers did not see them as emotional casting or harsh gameplay criticism.
Female Legends (FEMALEGG) issued the first public response. The organization stressed that the issue had nothing to do with gameplay analysis. Instead, it focused on personal attacks. These comments appeared right after the team’s first official match.
BIG EQUIPA player sosyaoai later explained what escalated the situation. After the game, she planned to clip her own 1v3 highlight. Instead, someone sent her a clip from the stream with a demeaning tone.
We were playing CCT — it was the team’s debut. I wanted to clip my 1v3. Then I got this instead. Is this really acceptable?
Soon after the backlash, the streamer removed both the clip and the broadcast.
read more
SigmaCast and partner responsibility
The discussion soon expanded beyond a single clip. Many users pointed to SigmaCast2. Critics describe the channel as betting-focused rather than analytical. They also accuse it of insulting teams the streamer bets against. Fans directly addressed tournament stakeholders, including Nodwin Gaming and the Champion of Champions Tour. They urged organizers to be more selective when granting co-streaming rights.
- “These streams make neutral viewing impossible.”
- “A commentator shapes the tournament atmosphere. He is not just another viewer.”
As a result, the debate shifted. People began to question whether organizers should take responsibility for authorized but unofficial broadcasts.
Community reaction: loud and divided
The CS2 community reacted instantly. Many users condemned the behavior outright. They argued that this conduct has no place in esports. Tournament tier or gender should not matter.
- “This is disgusting. There is no excuse.”
- “Tier-2 or tier-4 makes no difference. Respect is basic.”
- “Casters must be accountable for their words.”
Others disagreed. They claimed CS has always been harsh. Male teams face similar abuse every day. Some users said the backlash grew only because women were involved. A few dismissed the situation as exaggerated or politically driven.
This split revealed a deeper issue. The debate moved away from the behavior itself. It turned into a broader culture conflict. Once again, the players and their performance faded into the background.
More than one match
Many see the BIG EQUIPA case as part of a wider problem. Women’s teams in CS2 often face two challenges at once. They must prove their level in-game. At the same time, they endure increased off-server scrutiny.
In this case, the scene discusses the debut for the wrong reason. People talk about comments, not gameplay. That reflects poorly on more than one streamer. It also affects the tournament ecosystem, which aims to appear open and professional.
read more
A line still undefined
The BIG EQUIPA controversy raises a familiar question for CS2. Where is the line between emotional casting and outright disrespect? And who enforces it? So far, the answer has come only from the community. The response has been loud, emotional, and deeply divided. If CS2 wants to move forward, it will struggle to dismiss this case as just another toxic stream.
