The latest matchday at IEM Kraków 2026 delivered two very different narratives in Group A. Spirit produced a one-sided, dominant performance to sweep Natus Vincere in the upper bracket semi-final, securing a direct spot in the playoffs. Meanwhile, Astralis were forced into a far more demanding series, edging past PARIVISION 2–1 in the lower bracket to keep their tournament hopes alive.
NAVI vs Spirit — control from the opening round
NAVI entered the upper bracket semi-final hoping to stabilize after an inconsistent start to the event. While recent wins suggested progress in structure and coordination, the matchup against Spirit posed a serious test of resilience and adaptability — especially on LAN, where margins are unforgiving.
Spirit arrived with growing momentum and a clear identity: high tempo, relentless duels, and confidence in individual skill. With donk and sh1ro leading the charge, Spirit looked ready to punish any hesitation — and NAVI gave them little resistance.
Mirage — 16:14. Spirit edge the opener
Mirage began as NAVI’s best opportunity. The map remained competitive throughout regulation, with NAVI finding moments of success through mid control and late-round trading. However, once the score tightened, Spirit’s individual firepower tilted the balance. Key multi-kill rounds from donk pushed the map into overtime, where Spirit closed it out 16:14 — a psychological blow that shifted the series entirely.
Dust2 — 13:3. Total dominance
Dust2 was brutally one-sided. Spirit dictated every aspect of the map, winning opening duels and denying NAVI any space to operate. NAVI’s T-side collapsed under constant pressure, and economic control was lost almost immediately. Spirit raced to a 13:3 victory, completing a clean sweep with minimal resistance.
Player statistics for the match
Player of the match — Danil “donk” Kryshkovets
donk once again underlined his status as one of the most explosive players on the server:
- 1.65 rating
- 104.2 ADR
- 82.6% KAST
- +5.13% swing
His impact in early rounds and closing moments left NAVI with no room to recover.
PARIVISION vs Astralis — experience holds firm
Astralis survived a serious test from PARIVISION in the Group A lower bracket, securing a hard-fought 2–1 victory that once again highlighted the value of experience in high-pressure LAN matches. While PARIVISION showed resilience and structure, Astralis’ composure in decisive moments ultimately tipped the balance.
PARIVISION entered the series riding a strong run of results and a reputation for disciplined, team-oriented Counter-Strike. Their recent performances suggested a lineup capable of challenging established names, particularly when allowed to dictate tempo and play structured defaults.
For Astralis, the lower-bracket clash was about survival. With a roster still searching for consistency in 2026, elimination matches have become a familiar test. Against PARIVISION, the Danes needed to lean on fundamentals, clear communication, and late-round discipline to stay alive.
Overpass — 13:11. Astralis control the opener
Astralis set the tone on Overpass with a measured CT side, denying PARIVISION early map control and forcing slow, uncomfortable executes. PARIVISION found openings through mid-round aggression, but Astralis consistently responded with better spacing and utility usage. The map remained close, yet Astralis closed it 13:11 through cleaner late-round decisions.
Dust2 — 16:13. PARIVISION strike back
PARIVISION answered on their pick with a confident Dust2 performance. Faster pacing and sharper entries allowed them to pressure Astralis’ defenses, while strong individual moments kept the map competitive deep into regulation. PARIVISION edged out a 16:13 win, exposing Astralis’ occasional struggles when forced into reactive play.
Ancient — 13:7. Experience decides
The decider swung firmly in Astralis’ favor. On Ancient, the Danish side simplified their approach, focusing on solid defaults and minimizing risk. PARIVISION struggled to gain consistent map control, and once their early aggression was neutralized, rounds slipped away quickly. Astralis closed the map 13:7, sealing the series with authority.
Player statistics for the match
Player of the match — Jakob “jabbi” Nygaard
jabbi delivered a high-impact series under pressure:
- 1.44 rating
- 103.3 ADR
- +3.42% swing
His consistency across all three maps proved decisive in Astralis’ survival.
VRS impact
- Spirit: +49 points — move up the rankings and secure a stronger seeding position
- Natus Vincere: −17 points — costly loss at a critical stage
- Astralis: +70 points — major boost following elimination survival
- PARIVISION: −24 points — setback after a competitive but losing effort
read more
Tournament implications
Spirit advance directly to the playoffs, sending a clear message to the rest of the field: their ceiling is championship-level when confidence and structure align. NAVI drop out of the upper bracket with serious questions to answer, particularly around adaptability under pressure. Astralis remain alive in Kraków, once again proving that experience matters when elimination looms. PARIVISION exit the event despite flashes of quality, leaving with positives — but also a reminder of how thin the margins are at the top level.
IEM Kraków 2026 continues to reward decisiveness, late-round clarity, and mental resilience — and the pressure only escalates from here.
