The Swiss round opener between G2 and Gaimin Gladiators is a classic favorite-versus-underdog matchup. G2 enter the series as the clear statistical and structural favorite, while Gaimin Gladiators look to lean on comfort maps and individual momentum to stay competitive. At this stage of the tournament, experience and map depth usually outweigh raw upset potential.
Road to the Tournament
G2 arrive at ESL Pro League after an inconsistent but telling stretch of results:
- 0–2 vs Natus Vincere — struggled to gain early control.
- 2–0 vs HEROIC — disciplined execution and strong CT sides.
- 2–0 vs paiN — clear class difference.
- 1–2 vs PARIVISION — issues closing close maps.
- 1–2 vs Vitality — competitive but outmatched in late rounds.
The roster shows signs of stabilization. huNter- remains reliable in trading situations, HeavyGod has been the most consistent performer statistically, and malbsMd adds entry pressure. G2’s issues tend to appear when their tempo drops — but structurally, they remain solid.
Gaimin Gladiators come in with a mixed regional resume:
- 0–2 vs 9z — lacked mid-round answers.
- 0–3 vs MIBR — overwhelmed by pace.
- 2–0 vs 9z — better structure on comfort maps.
- 2–1 vs Sharks — relied on individual impact.
- 2–0 vs BESTIA Academy — expected result.
JOTA and HEN1 provide experience, while felps and Luken look to create space. However, against top-tier European structure, their margin for error is minimal.
Current Form & Context
G2 look far more comfortable in a Bo3 against lower-ranked opposition. Mirage (75%) remains their strongest battleground, while Ancient (67%) offers flexibility as a secondary option. Their weaknesses — Overpass (25%) and Anubis (33%) — are manageable in a controlled veto.
Gaimin Gladiators show strong numbers on Dust2 (80%) and Ancient (75%), but these results come from a limited sample size and against weaker opposition. Their Inferno (0%) and lack of depth across the pool remain major concerns.
Map Pool & Veto Analysis (Bo3, last 3 months)
- Dust2: G2 40% | Gaimin Gladiators 80%
- Mirage: G2 75% | Gaimin Gladiators —
- Inferno: G2 33% | Gaimin Gladiators 0%
- Nuke: G2 — | Gaimin Gladiators 50%
- Overpass: G2 25% | Gaimin Gladiators —
- Ancient: G2 67% | Gaimin Gladiators 75%
- Anubis: G2 33% | Gaimin Gladiators —
Likely bans:
- G2 remove Dust2 (80% for Gaimin Gladiators).
- Gaimin Gladiators remove Mirage (75% for G2).
Likely picks:
- G2: Ancient.
- Gaimin Gladiators: Nuke or Inferno.
Decider: Anubis or Overpass — maps where G2’s individual quality should still give them the edge.
VRS & Tournament Context
G2 (#10, 1597 pts)
- 0 pts for a win
- –30 pts for a loss
Gaimin Gladiators (#66, 1107 pts)
- +52 pts for a win
- –3 pts for a loss
For G2, this is a must-win opener — anything else would be a significant setback. For Gaimin Gladiators, the pressure is low, with only upside potential.
read more
Prediction
Gaimin Gladiators may be competitive on their comfort map, particularly if Dust2 slips through. However, across a full Bo3, G2’s superior structure, experience, and individual consistency should prevail.
Expected score: G2 2–0 Gaimin Gladiators
Unless G2 collapse economically or allow the series to spiral into chaos, this matchup strongly favors the European side to start their ESL Pro League campaign with a clean win.
