After another series of major tournaments and months of play at the highest level, professional players are increasingly vocal about the problems of Counter-Strike 2. Despite regular updates from Valve, the scene largely agrees on one thing: the game still requires serious technical and gameplay fixes, and some of them directly affect fairness and overall comfort during play.
What concerns players the most
One of the most discussed topics has been the performance of the Source engine, which many consider the root of the key issues. Players from different regions and teams openly point to strange behavior in hit registration and player movement.
Xfloud:
The tickrate needs to be fixed — sometimes you shoot and the opponent dies half a second later, or already dies behind a wall.
This quote clearly illustrates the general feeling of instability that even players competing on LAN and top-tier hardware are experiencing.
read more
Technical issues and game feel
A separate layer of criticism relates to overall smoothness, FPS, and character movement. Some pro players note that CS2 feels less stable than CS:GO at its peak, especially in high-pressure situations.
Among the most frequently mentioned issues are:
- unstable FPS and performance drops;
- “heavy” and unnatural movement;
- problems with stairs and silent movement;
- a general sense of unfinished animations and physics.
According to players, these aspects directly affect competitive balance and force them to adapt not to opponents, but to the game itself.
Economy and weapon balance
Another equally sharp topic is the CS2 economy. Several pro players emphasize that the current system needs revision, especially given the pace of the game and the power of certain weapons.
In particular, they point to:
- the inflated cost of the AWP;
- the excessive effectiveness of the MP9;
- overall round imbalance after recent economy changes.
Some players state directly that the current economy creates a bias toward specific playstyles and limits tactical depth.
Other critical remarks
Beyond the fundamental issues, players also mention problems that Valve has not yet managed to resolve systemically. These include cheaters, the VRS system, and the absence of familiar elements from CS:GO, such as a fully functional BHOP, which for many was part of mechanical mastery.
These remarks are not framed as nostalgia, but as a demand for a deeper and more stable game ecosystem tailored to modern esports.
The pro players’ opinion is clear
CS2 has already become the main competitive discipline, but the pro players’ view is unambiguous: the game’s potential is still far from fully realized. The Source engine, economy, movement, and technical stability are not minor details — they are fundamental elements on which the scene’s trust in the product depends.
Valve are closely monitoring community feedback, but the real question is how quickly and decisively they are willing to respond. In modern Counter-Strike, the competition is not only between teams, but also between player expectations and the actual state of the game.
